Pre-Industrial European Labour Market Essay Example for Free

Pre-Industrial European Labour trade EssayIn this critical review I will comp be the two texts by calamus Earle and Elise van Nederveen Meerkerk. The articles be about womans prep be to work in the 17th and early eighteenth speed of light respectively about womens work in the Dutch fabric industry and effeminate do work tag in capital of the United Kingdom. The article by Earle (in 1989) is released before Meerkerks article (2006) and there are in Meerkerk analysis some pointing to Earles article.I will start with a short instauration of each of the two articles, how and from what meter data is collected, some of the findings and conclusion. And then what contribution their papers have make to the historical debate about womens role in the pre-industrial advertise foodstuff.Both Earle and Meerkerk refer to Alice Clarks groundbreaker study from 1919 about womens work in production in pre-industrial time1 2. Earle is more critical to her work than Meerkerk. Peter Ea rle is the first person after Alice Clark to play deep and critically into how women had it in the excavate market in the 17th and 18th century. In his article Earle is saying Indeed, it would be fair to say that we love virtually nothing about the female labour force in early modern London except in the most unstructured and superficial way3. An important note Earle makes in his introduction is that the arguments that Alice Clark put forward has more or less just became accepted and Peter Earle is the first one to outpouring Alice Clarks analyze4. A main thing Meerkerk and Earle are concentrating on is Clark statement that there where a specious age for women in the 17th and 18th century.What becomes clear in Meerkeerk article is that she is influenced by development in economic theory and social theory as well. The way Meerkeerk and Earle do their analyze is different. A study reason for that is that Meerkeerk is a social scientist while Earle is a traditional empiricist his torian. What is easy to see is that Earle look at numbers much more than Meerkerk do, and while Meerkerk also look at numbers, she uses market theories as well such as the split market theory to analyze the findings. Katrina Honeyman and Jordan Goodman used this when they where looking at European womens work between1500 19005.Peter Earle is more or less guided by his sources. He goes thru his sources and construct figures 6 from his sources. He also takes other sources from other historians such as Wrigley and Schofield 7. And this is what he is basing his conclusion on.Meerkerk on the other hand developed a frame work, she had an judgement before she starting on the research. The idea is that of how to analyze her data. Based upon works from many social scientists and historians and their findings, she found that we must therefore derive a new theoretical framework to explain the working of gender in the pre-industrial labour marked 8. On this background she analysed the data. H er work became a supplement to understand the segmentation of the labour market. Meerkerk wanted to know who got the impression jobs, who got the peripheral jobs and why men tends to earn more than women even if they are doing the same work. Core jobs are higher paid and productivity while peripheral jobs is lower paid and lower productivity.Peter Earle has data from witnesses and defendants in the time period of approximately 1660 1725. Earle have an impressive poppycock from whole London shared out by districts, occupations, full-time and part-time, women and men and their age. He also has data from which class the citizens are from, if they are pep pill class or lower class (low wealth to high wealthy), and also reading skills and illiterate9. Earle is self-stating that poor population are under represented because they werent literate enough to be called as witnesses10Meerkerks material not less impressive than Earles, is from last quarter of the sixteenth century, first half of seventeenth century and 1810. Other than showing women in the textile industry in Holland, she are showing the percentage of conjoin women who are in work, men and women in different industries, different jobs, heads of family per industrial sector and heads of family in textile industry. She also looks at women and mens income. Meerkerk also has an analyse of guilds in the textile industry11. What is worth mentioning is that Tilburg and Leiden who are the main places in Holland she is looking at was wealthy places economically mainly because of the textile industry.Conclusion make up though they goes with their work in a different way, they both come up with similar conclusions. no(prenominal) of them believes it was a golden-age for women. Meerkerk said women where restricted to peripheral and low paid jobs but it was changeable, depending upon industry and it as is notice when women occasionally gets better paid jobs, but as soon the industry starts to decline women wh ere the first to light-headed their job. The fine jobs womens ones had, where then given to men. Its easy to see there where gender discrimination.As mentioned, Earle has a kind of similar conclusion He means that women where expected to work at that time to support their family. Women got low-paid and low skilled jobs while men got the higher paid jobs (core jobs). Meerkerk and Earles works congratulate each other as to real knowledge about womens situation on the labour marked in pre-industrial times. What Meerkerks work gives us more than Clark is supplement to the theories about segmented labour marked and the labour marked segregated by gender, and she are valuable to understand the labour marked in preindustrial time and todays labour marked as well.BibliographyEarle, Peter The female labour market in London in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century, 1989 Economic business relationship Review, 2nd ser., XLII, 3(1989), pp. 328-353Meerkerk, Elise Van Nederveen Segm entation in the Pre-Industrial Labour Market Womens Work in the Dutch Textile Industry, 1581 1810 page 189 216, 2006 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis