Attitudes towards homosexuality in the long 19th century Essay

Attitudes towards quirkiness in the long 19th century - Essay representativeHowever, one thing that is evident is the fact that modern attitudes towards homo sex activity have been a centre coif for battles between religious and good concepts. Before the eighteenth century, Christianity was seen to be reluctant in dealing with issues of homosexuality. However, incidences of antipathy towards homosexuality began to be experienced in umpteen parts of the world. Later, the underpinnings of homosexuality involved incorporation of legal sanctions and religious teachings. The main issue is would seem was the subscription to social norms and homosexuality seen as defiant behaviour which the companionship feared. According to Clinard and Frank (2011, pp11), norms make crucial contributions to the process of maintaining order. During this time, it is reported that most of the American colonies began to enact frightful penalties for sexual crimes. By the end of the 19th century, there e merged competition between law and religion against abnormal psychology and medicine over sexuality and specifically homosexuality. In this regard, the concept of homosexuality undertook a different work out from being viewed as a sin to being viewed as a crime. This drastic change of the preaching about homosexuality was viewed as progressive since slightly considerations such as a sick person who committed sexual crime was less blameful than a healthy person. Rationale for advocacy of homosexuality Although medicine and psychiatry insisted on treating homosexuality as pathology, Sigmund Freud, on his basic theory of human sexuality viewed that all human beings were innately bisexual. His argument was that human beings become heterosexual or homosexual in the course of interacting with other people. However, Freud posited that homosexuality should be viewed as a kind of pathology. In fact, in his storied letter to an American mother, he argued that, although homosexuality is no advantage, it should not amount to something to be ashamed of. This, fit to Freud was because homosexuality is not a vice, does not degrade, and cannot be classified as an illness. With such deliberations, it is apparent that many people viewed sexuality differently. Nevertheless, the articulation of sexuality under the perspective of medicine and psychiatry was based on the idea that persons with homosexuality had pathology concerns that needed to be addressed. With numerous studies conducted on persons with these problems, psychiatrists believed that there was a need to comprehensively come up with a mechanism through which the society could appreciate that these people have a psychological problem that need to be addressed. Many authors such as Clinard and Frank (2011) bakshised out that in another dimension they believed that treating persons with sexuality problems like criminals without subjecting them to psychological treatment would increase the problem by creating sup ererogatory psychological complications. Some of the raised concerns included statistics of persons convicted of committing sexual related crimes, and who later died or developed some mental disorders while still in prison or after being released from prison. Homosexuality has had a long history. The 18th century can be seen as a significant turning point of homosexuality and gay rights. Probably for the first time in the history of man, homosexuality received censorious look in a number of ways. Professionals