Critical Thinking Master Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words

Critical Thinking Master - Case Study causaThe commitments by his team members or his boss regarding iScanner are not valid because they do not survive the bigger picture.Pat is trying to put her weight on him because she holds a senior designation in the company.Marketing personnel have the habit to jump to conclusions in the spurt of their aggression with surface trying to derive the product capabilities and positioning in a marketplace segment. Pat hasnt done her homework in estimating the gross revenue performance of the proposed product.Chris hasnt done his homework in concluding the budgetary figuresThe Organization hasnt developed any in the raw product for more than a decade and hence lacks expertise in the same.Chris said yes to the plan to a lower place pressure from Pat and Cliff. He has not given due diligence from his side as well.Assumptions by Pat LambertPat has a sound retail background and hence feels that her scenes about the market are more powerful than su rvey reports and data analysis.She is more than convinced about the success of her idea. get into an innovation will ensure ample time to Pat thus taking her away from spry revenue target pressuresAfter reading the high level specifications of the iScanner software, Pat assumed that slight modifications in the product will make it suitable to be used in the application of her thought.Pat got a positive response from Kelly in a discussion that, in the opinion of Pat was a good discussion while Kelly assumed that it is a casual discussion out of curiosity. Pat withalk his positive resolve as Technical Approval.An approval from Chris is good enough for her to class a proposal to Cliff. Kelly is too junior to be involved in the bigger picture at this... Kelly is proud to be the break architect of the iScanner Software and hence assumes that no plans in the company pertaining to this product can be booming without his approvals. He got mad when he came across a number of features defined by Pat that were discussed with his Boss and the CEO but not with him.He is not worried about the safety of his job in the company. Whatever might happen to others in the organization, he is convinced that his job cannot be taken because he is indispensable for the organization.Pat got a positive response from Kelly in a discussion that, in the perspective of Pat was a serious discussion while Kelly assumed that it is a casual discussion out of curiosity. Pat took his positive reply as Technical Approval.An approval from Chris is good enough for her to build a proposal to Cliff. Kelly is too junior to be involved in the bigger picture at this stage and specifically when he has already given his so called Technical Approval.Pat thought that after seeing the approvals from Cliff and Chris, Kelly will immediately get to work (given his level in the company, he is not supposed to question her decision and their approvals).